$15,000,000+ Recovered
Client was injured by dangerous equipment on the defendant's property. Liability and the extent of the injuries were contested.
Client was injured by dangerous equipment on the defendant's property. The defendant maintained that the client was solely responsible for the accident and contested both liability and the extent of the injuries sustained.
Liability and the extent of the injuries were contested by the defendant who blamed the client as being the sole cause of the accident. This required presenting compelling evidence to prove the property owner's negligence.
The defendant's insurance company fought the case aggressively, denying responsibility and minimizing the extent of the injuries. They made pre-suit settlement offers that were far below the true value of the case.
After several days of trial, we were able to prove our case to the jury and secure a verdict that recognized the full extent of our client's injuries and the defendant's responsibility.
Jury verdict exceeding all pre-suit settlement offers
If you've been injured in a similar situation, contact SC Injury Law for a consultation.
Contact UsExperienced representation
Every case is unique, but our experience can help you understand your rights and options.
Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Each case is unique.
Important: Any information provided by you through this website, or otherwise, SC Injury Law does not establish an attorney-client relationship until such time as there exists a written and signed attorney retainment agreement.
